Wednesday, April 25, 2012

The Discrimination we face in School

The way we view school is almost immaculate. It is a play in our, eyes, that is free from racism, prejudice, and degredation. But at times, this is not always the case.  There are haters everywhere and speaking as a realist, the world will never be free of them. Let me cite some examples.

First let's go to the stereotype:
I'm sure I've written about stereotypical, people and students in my previous entries. Remember the movies that we watched about high schools in the US? I'm sure we've noticed the ever-antagonistic, "popular kids". They have their own tables, their own group of people that willingly follow them without question, and they constantly snub the "nerds". Schools today are highly unlikely to show students with this kind of behavior. But I will make the comparison.

Schools in real life:
In my opinon, discrimination is as strong as ever. However, it is almost unapparent. Students have mastered the art of belittling other people so discreetly, that it does not reach the word of the teachers/principals. I believe that this is the way it should be. I think as equals, discrimination will not cease and it is the other persons problem of how he views other people. However it is wrong for discrimination to be the cause of punishment, or lack of rewarding to a student. It should not be the policy of how desicions are made. People are free to think as they wish, and even say as they wish (with the consequences of course). 

What is my point?
My point is that discrimination is everywhere and cannot be removed because it is a point of view. And removing a point of view is tantamount to taking away the right to free opinion. Even authority figures can personally discriminate against other people, no one is stopping them from hating another nationality. It becomes wrong however, when that is how they make their decisions and treat the people below them based on their personal beliefs. You can be racist against your employee as much as you like, but you still have to treat them fairly and with respect.

Friday, April 20, 2012

Frodo

Frodo Baggins is one of the central, if not arguably the main character, in J.R.R. s best selling book, The Lord of the Rings. He is an intelligent, graceful hobbit, who inherits the evil Dark Lord Sauron’s Ring of Power. He must make the agonizing decision to try to destroy the ring by taking it from his beloved home in the Shire to Sauron’s evil country of Mordor, so he can if possible, cast the ring into the depths of the fiery Mount Doom.

There are a few important points about Frodo Baggins that must be settled especially for those who are only familiar with Peter Jackson’s film versions of Tolkien’s books. First, though tend to have longer lives than humans, and look younger for much longer (which is enhanced by wearing Sauron’s ring), Frodo is not just a youngster. When Tolkien’s book opens, Frodo is about to celebrate his 33rd birthday, the typical year for coming of age for hobbits. He is 50 when he sets off on his perilous quest, an echo of the age his Uncle Bilbo (really a cousin) was when Bilbo began his "adventure," in the book, The Hobbit.

There is much in the character of Frodo that is admirable, and as his journey continues, his figure becomes distinctly Christlike. He is clearly and fully aware that he is sacrificing himself in the hope that the world will be saved. As a hobbit, he begins Tolkien’s book being described as somewhat different from other hobbits. Under the tutelage of Bilbo, Frodo has learned some Elvish, and the wizard gandalf describes his mind as "quick," not always the case with hobbits, who can be quite simple folk.

Though he loves the Shire, his homeland, he is torn by the desire to go adventuring like Bilbo did, and though he has many hobbit characteristics, like a good sense of humor and a love of mushrooms, he has more of a thoughtful mind and adventuring spirit.

As Tolkien’s novel progresses, Frodo Baggins is increasingly tested especially by the continued need to carry the enemy’s ring, which corrupts all who come into contact with it. The chief need for Frodo is to remain as free as he can of this taint, and have the mental strength to ultimately cast the ring away. This is no easy task, since possession of the ring is not only corruptive but also addictive.

In his journeys, Frodo is accompanied by his faithful servant sam gamgee, and later is guided by the former ring bearer and desperate creature Gollum. A Jungian interpretation of Gollum/Sméagol would clearly call Gollum Frodo’s shadow. In most other interpretations, Gollum is merely clear indication of what Frodo would become if he chose to claim the ring for his own. To remain Frodo Baggins and resist being Gollum is a terribly difficult task.

Yet Gollum serves Frodo, in some instances, extremely well. It should be recollected that Gollum and not Frodo is ultimately responsible for the ring’s destruction, and further, that Peter Jackson’s film version once again veers from the original. When Gollum seizes the ring from Frodo by biting the poor hobbit’s finger off, Frodo does not respond with violent act or deed. Instead, Gollum in his madness and exultant joy at gaining the ring dances too close to the edge of Mount Doom’s volcano and falls in. Frodo does not push him in.

iIn the end, the experience of bearing the ring makes returning to the Shire and living there too difficult for Frodo Baggins. Instead of remaining in the Shire, which Frodo believes he’s saved for others, not for himself, he leaves with the last of the elves to go to the Gray Havens. He has gone from land loving hobbit to one of the great heroes in fiction, and his end is both fitting and sad. The Gray Havens suggest immortality, and perhaps Tolkien little knew that his character would become nearly immortal to the many readers who have treasured his work. Frodo combines ultimate self-sacrifice with abiding love, and is thus to be cherished; small of stature, but immeasurably great in spirit.

Declaration Defense

I hope everyone enjoyed playing Thomas Jefferson because I definitely felt relieved when we finished. We were divided into groups and tasked to make our own paper consisting of what we want to change/add to in MIT. I was group with Renzo, Monica, and John. From day one there were already problems. Renzo and I were actually the only members who actually brainstormed and thought of ideas while the other half of the group did nothing. This went on for about two days.

 When Ms. Mae started calling groups, I realized that we were not going to get squat. We were basically a two man team. What could possibly go wrong?

A lot, actually. However, I will get to that. Right now I will talk about the group of Tim and friends, (or whatever they are). They advocated for the free usage of the printers so long as there is a valid reason to do so. One other issue they raised was the high prices in the cafetria. I had more or less mixed feelings about their argument. I can't say I agree with the  free printer usage, but I can totally support the cafetria issue.

Then there are some individuals who just love to contradict. Even though somtimes, the argument goes in circles and the points contradicted by said person, would not be practically speaking, good for the school. However, freedom of speech is still valid in this universe, so a person can be as annoying as they want...... and more.

I will skip to our turn. Our "demand" was, contrary to Tim's group where they had a passionate and misleading introduction, more of a proposal. Instead of blaming the school for not "doing their job", like all the other groups did, we respectfully showed the benefits of a modified approach to learning.

Of course, that was very unclear to everyone, including certain individuals who once again due to Freedom of Speech, will contradict completely invalid points.

Example 1: I already said twice, that we were only PROPOSING. Then certain individuals, will ask the same questions in different forms. All with the same "why should the school do this or the school wouldnt implement that.".

This was completely irrelevant. Why? Because to be able to know what the school decides, they have to be in the administration doing what they do everyday. What sets my group apart is that we, or at least I, understand that to assume that you know what the school should do you have to be in there everyday. That is why our introduction is not as forceful as the others. Because we would not like to look like complete idiots if the admin asks as, "Hey, do you think you could do our job or make the hrad day to day descicions everyday?". Our group will not be asked that because we are only proposing.

Ms Mae, you asked us not to refer to you in the third person in our blogs so I will ask you directly. Please think about what I said and about who you should give the highest grade to. And since I am the only one who has said that we could not possibly know what Dr. Santos, Mr. Kwon, or you have to do in the school. In effect, with the respectfull introduction of our declaration, I believe the highestgrade should go to the one who learned the most important lesson. So what I learned is that you cannot possibly make a  forcing statement, like what others did, that the school SHOULD do, unless you know how to run a school.

BTW ( I didn't learn this because I made the mistake of a forcing introduction, in fact my)introduction, never forced any change, merely suggest. :) )



Friday, April 13, 2012

Incoming prom

I should probably start by telling what my thoughts are for the upcoming prom for grades 9 on wards. To start, this is the very first prom that i would have ever experienced in my entire life, so I would want to see what it's like. According to some people, prom sucks. They have really bad experiences such as break-ups, loneliness, etc. According to others, it will be remembered as something good because they've had the best night of their lives.

Now let's go to what I see in the movies. I know what they show is highly stereotypical. The nerds go in one direction and they most likely will not have a date. Then they complain bitterly about how it isn't fair that the big muscular guy gets the girl. One eventually musters the courage to ask a girl, then get publicly humiliated by being harshly turned down.

Then the jocks come and they're the superstars of the entire event. The girls want them, guys want to be them, and they walk ever so slowly with an aura that only movies form the 1980's can bring us. Let's not forget the ever popular bully. They're basically the ones dumping nerds in the toilet. This may include but is not limited to the jocks, but they usually are too full of themselves to even notice the nerds.

Now, all these sources, second hand and from movies, give my various ideas on what I might have to expect on April 19. I cannot say for sure how it will pan out. There is only one thing I can conclude based on the movies and other people. It will definitely be a night that I will never forget.

(PS. my next entry about the prom will be after it happens so stay alert)

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

What happened this week.

This comes as a surprise to me. This week was actually not that hard. I mean we had a quiz in math and a seating arrangement change in English which up to now, kinda messes up my fetish for routines. I hope Ms. Mae then, can sympathize with my OCD'sh feeling ( if ya know what I mean).

However, despite that, I still learned something. I learned that assent means to give aprroval to. You know sometimes when we speak english so much, we tend  to forget that there are actually words that we do not know. I even had to ask help from Ms. Mae as I was stuck in trying to piece together the context clues.

Though I do not remember what the context was exactly, I remember that it had something to do with the King of England refusing to give his consent for his governors to pass laws that will improve the lives of the public.
America, as Ms Mae, mentioned, created a literary masterpiece. This was due to the logic that was involved in the Declaration of Independence.

Here is what I think about it. Personally, I thought it was great political strategy on the part of America. The fact that they mentioned the "candid world" line earned my respect for this piece. They were very careful not to mention any specific country as the opressor or the victim. With that already mentioned, they could say that they are only claiming what is their natural rights, and eventually became an incredibly major factor in winning their Independence from Great Britain.

One of my other personal thoughts is that it makes perfect sense for us to be advocating a list of things we want in school. Some in my opinion are just nonsensical. Others, like the one my group made :) should definitely be considered in a very serious manner.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Wrestlemania 28

hey, guys, yes this is also another post that was left in the drafts to rot until today.\

Anyways, back to my topic.


WrestleMania 28 was full of thrilling moments—a handful of which will never be forgotten. There were a few misses in WWE's showcase event—like Sheamus taking out Daniel Bryan in 18 seconds. But, all in all, this was a tremendous success for the company.

The next three moments ensured that.


Not a lot was expected of this match, which is a big part of the reason it was so thrilling. This match delivered in a big way, however, and it came right after the Sheamus' 18-second victory.

Kane and Orton went back and forth, as the two battled through huge moves and blows. It was widely speculated that Orton would emerge victorious from this match, and that seemed to be the way it was heading as Orton fought off a pin following a choke-slam.


That only set the stage for the bigger choke-slam. Orton was about to finish Kane off from the top rope, when Kane came to life, grabbed Orton's neck and slammed him to the mat.

It was a great finishing move, and it set the stage for the rest of the evening.



2. Undertaker Helps Triple H from the Ring

This match seems to be the biggest highlight of the night for most fans, and for good reason. It was a truly epic match.

The three of them—you have to include guest referee Shawn Michaels in there—battled in the cage well beyond what anyone could have expected. This was a grueling back-and-forth match that the Undertaker was ultimately able to win.

I have so much more to add but then I would be a spoiler wouldn't I?

You guys will just have to watch the rest of the show for yourselves




What i did during the break

hey guys, you know those funny moments where you overlook something little and it turns out it could potentially affect something important? Something like saving a post in the drafts and not being able to post it until the deadline? Yeah that just happened.

For the most part of this break I've been trying to get into economics. Now, we all know that next year, Grade 10 will be having economics as a subject. For those people taking economics in college, it will shed a litle light on what you will have to expect.

For those whose first time is hearing it, you definitely have the question "What is economics?'

Economics is the study of how people choose to use resources.

Resources include the time and talent people have available, the land, buildings, equipment, and other tools on hand, and the knowledge of how to combine them to create useful products and services.

Often, people appear to use their resources to improve their well-being. Well-being includes the satisfaction people gain from the products and services they choose to consume, from their time spent in leisure and with family and community as well as in jobs, and the security and services provided by effective governments. Sometimes, however, people appear to use their resources in ways that don't improve their well-being.

In short, economics includes the study of labor, land, and investments, of money, income, and production, and of taxes and government expenditures. Economists seek to measure well-being, to learn how well-being may increase over time, and to evaluate the well-being of the rich and the poor. The most famous book in economics is the Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations written by Adam Smith, and published in 1776 in Scotland.

Although the behavior of individuals is important, economics also addresses the collective behavior of businesses and industries, governments and countries, and the globe as a whole.

Oh, and did I mention that Economics is an effective pre-law? Yup for those attempting to become a lawyer, that is a good course to take.